![]() |
FFL Holders
I had a FFL almost 20 years ago. Never used it at the time. I was thinking of getting one again. Is it worth paying those services to get the necessary papers, or will the BATF website send you all that you need, with no runaround? Seems like a good thing to have as a possible side business, or just to get one's own personal toys.
|
Re: FFL Holders
If you go through the process, please let us know how it goes.
From what I've heard, it's a real pain, even for a brick and mortar. Kitchen table? Forget about it. That said, it's all second hand info, so I don't really KNOW. |
Re: FFL Holders
I looked into this in my area, but it's no longer practical unless you actually plan to open a gun shop. There's a requirement for a bona fide, properly zoned storefront with public business hours, as well as local red tape in addition to the federal paperwork. The "How to Get Your FFL" instruction booklets I've found are more or less obsolete.
|
Re: FFL Holders
Yea you have to have the local sheriff sign off on it, the guys here is pretty decent from what I have been told (my dealer is a kitchen table dealer), but i think we'll see the kitchen table guys start to lose their licenses once the regime changes.
|
Re: FFL Holders
When I requested the forms for my C&R license from the BATF website, I got them pronto - no hassles.
|
Re: FFL Holders
For personal use stick with the Curio & Relic license. It's simple to get if you're patient and only $30 for 3-yrs and then $10 every year thereafter.
:wink: |
Re: FFL Holders
C&R isn't much use if your 'personal use' items aren't obsolete.
|
Re: FFL Holders
Quote:
Yugo SKS 59/66 Colt 45-auto 1927 Model CZ pistols Walther P-38 .......to name a few. |
Re: FFL Holders
And except for the 1911, they're all obsolete.
By definition, surplus arms are obsolete arms. Ivan didn't sell those things off for 5 FRNS each because they're cutting edge. Not to say they can't/don't still serve a purpose. But just because something is semi auto doesn't make it non obsolete, just like something NOT being semi auto doesn't make it obsolete (RE: Chey Tac and Rem M40A1 bolt guns). |
Re: FFL Holders
Quote:
http://www.floridagunworks.com/Merch...000001/043.jpg And I'd hardly call the SKS obsolete........plenty of mod upgrades to make improvements if necessary. http://www.classicarms.us/images/M59-66.jpg The basic functioning of semi-autos has not changed in 60-70 years. :bear_rolleyes: |
Re: FFL Holders
Quote:
Now, if a military is looking for lighter weight arms, lower costs in production, or cartridge compatibility then the older arms are 'surplus' which means nothing to the privateer who isn't outfitting 1 million soldiers. I do agree that lots if not most of C&R items are outdated, old, and obsolete but don't discount ALL of them. :wink: |
Re: FFL Holders
1ex�cept http://www.merriam-webster.com/images/audio.gif Pronunciation: \ik-ˈsept\ Variant(s): also ex�cept�ing http://www.merriam-webster.com/images/audio.gif \-ˈsep-tiŋ\ Function: preposition Date: 14th century : with the exclusion or exception of <daily except Sundays:biggrin:
As I said, except for the 1911 clone, they're all obsolete. ob⋅so⋅lete /ˌɒbhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/g...una/thinsp.pngsəˈlit, ˈɒbhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/g...una/thinsp.pngsəˌlit/ Show Spelled Pronunciation http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/dictiona...on_default.gif [ob-suh-leet, ob-suh-leet] Show IPA Pronunciation http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/dictiona...on_default.gif adjective, verb, -let⋅ed, -let⋅ing. –adjective 1.no longer in general use; fallen into disuse: an obsolete expression. 2.of a discarded or outmoded type; out of date: an obsolete battleship. I never said any were useless. Back to the original purpose of the thread, if one wants any firearm designed or built in the last 60 years, the C&R IS useless, as I'm sure, the OP is well aware.:moon: |
Re: FFL Holders
The CZ-82 is C&R, but I don't consider it obsolete. In fact, it is a very nice handgun.
|
Re: FFL Holders
Anyhow to the topic at hand, it's no substitute for an FFL, no matter how much you love the sks or 1911, it's a lot more limited then an FFL
|
Re: FFL Holders
Quote:
I'm a bodyman/painter by trade, so I'm looking to get into refinishing. Duracoating, parkerzing, hot blueing, ect. First thing I did was get the forms from the BATFE, they are free. The next step is to get approval from the city you live in, they approved me for having a "gunsmithing buisness". You have to get approval from your city first, if you don't have it the ATF won't give you a lisc. Next you have to get an LLC or a sole propietership(sp?), get a State ID number and a Federal ID number. Get fingerprinted, fill out paper work, get your local head LEO to sign off on it. Send your paper work in with check. About three months later you will have an inspection/interview with an ATF agent. About a month after that, they will cash your check. About another month after that you will get you FFL if you are approved. If they don't cash your check, you aren't approved and they will return the check to you. This isn't set in stone, but this is what my friend went through a few years back. But generally how it works. The biggest thing the ATF is looking for is you are going to be running a BUISNESS and frown on people holding an FFL just for collecting. Once every three years, you get a suprise inspection. GN |
Re: FFL Holders
Quote:
|
Re: FFL Holders
Yea definitely keep us posted, I've been tossing around the idea, my dealer always tells me I should do it.
I am interested to see how it goes, good luck! |
Re: FFL Holders
C&R's are dangerous ground if you do anything to them to make them "less obsolete". Case in point the SKS. If you have an original and do basically anything to it, you are now under 922 and need to change out your parts to make it less than 10 imported. I am trying to figure out the legality of mine and if I can put it into the clothes and stuff that I have for it.
At this point, legally, I think the sks is best left with original stocks and equipment, with a small scope and learn to use stripper clips. I don't want to have a federal, let alone a state issue. I am still researching, but it seems that you can unintentionally and even "constructively" build an Illegal firearm by just changing stocks or something simple on a C&R rifle. |
Re: FFL Holders
Quote:
The stock counts as 3 parts (US replacement) The mag counts as 3 parts (US replacement) Hope this helps with your 922r compliance. :wink: Also, you can replace the muzzle break & piston + operating rod for 3 more parts (US replacement). |
Re: FFL Holders
What fun 922r is!
http://home.comcast.net/~navy87guy/home/922r.html |
Re: FFL Holders
Here's a great link for 922r Compliance from the TAPCO site :
http://www.tapco.com/section922r.aspx (c) For purposes of this section, the term imported parts are: (1) Frames, receivers, receiver castings, forgings or stampings (2) Barrels (3) Barrel extensions (4) Mounting blocks (trunions) (5) Muzzle attachments (6) Bolts (7) Bolt carriers (8) Operating rods (9) Gas pistons (10) Trigger housings (11) Triggers (12) Hammers (13) Sears (14) Disconnectors (15) Butt stocks (16) Pistol grips (17) Forearms, hand guards (18) Magazine bodies (19) Followers (20) Floor plates 17 Parts are regulated for the SKS meaning you'd have to replace 7 of them. Only 16 parts regulated for the AK though. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM